Results tagged ‘ Los Angeles Angels ’

Comparing the starting pitching for both teams

Much has been, and will continue to be made, about the starting pitching of the Yankees and Angels. Rightfully so as the starting pitching will most likely be the deciding factor of the series. The Yankees are coming off a great ALDS where (aside from the heroics of Alex Rodriguez), their starters were the reason they were able to sweep. The Angels are still riding high from an equally (some people believe more) impressive sweep of the Red Sox. John Lackey and Jered Weaver shut down a lifeless Boston offense in the first two games, and Kazmir kept them just close enough to win Game 3. So, the question is, who has the advantage?

The case for the Yankees begins with one Carston Charles Sabathia; he is the best starting pitcher on either team and could possibly be the single most important player in the series (with the possibility of him starting Games 1, 4, and 7). The robust left-hander is coming off 6.2 innings of 8 hit, 2 run (1 earned) playoff baseball. He struck out 8 and walked none is his handling of the Twins. I say handling because he was good, but by no means great. He did not command the strike zone well with his fastball and had to rely heavily on his devastating slider. To me, this makes what he did all the more impressive. The true test of a starting pitcher is what they can do on a night where everything isn’t right; the first game of the ALDS proved to Yankee fans what they already know: CC is a bona fide ace who can win a game without his best stuff. This is the kind of guy you want to lean on in a grueling seven game series.
The other two starters, AJ Burnett and Andy Pettitte, have been the subject of a fair amount of skepticism. Although CC had his postseason ghosts, the way he had been pitching really negated the question. However, AJ went through an awful stretch in August that raised many questions about the state of the Yankees pitching. Andy Pettitte hit a slight road bump with a tired shoulder, which prompted the obligatory, “Is he healthy,” questions. After watching the ALDS, I think much of the negativity surrounding these two has dissolved. Burnett went 6 innings giving up 3 hits, 1 run and striking out 6 while walking 5. Pettitte went 6 and a third giving up 1 run on 3 hits with 7 K’s and 1 walk. 
To me, the only questions about the Yankee starters are as follows: will the walks the Burnett is bound to hand out haunt the Yankees more against the Angels than they did against the Twins (I tend to think yes), and will they decide to screw the 4th starter and just go with their three best (I think yes again, it’s that time of year folks).
The Angels top two starters, Lackey and Weaver, impressed more with their ALDS performances, some say, because of who they did it against: the mighty Red Sox. The Sox were coming off, arguably, their best offensive month (Sept./Oct.) as a team, hitting 43 home runs, finishing with their highest batting average in any month (.286) and a season high in total bases (493). So it wasn’t that they were limping to the finish line, but the Sox sure seemed lifeless against the Angels. Sure, there is credit to be given to the Halos, but I think there’s more to this.
The first two games of the ALDS were of course played in Anaheim. The 2009 Red Sox finished 39-42 on the road, meaning they were the only playoff team without a winning record on the road. While they had an OPS of .806 in the regular season, good for second in the league behind the Yankees, their road OPS was a mere .753, similar to the season number for the Indians and the Marlins. The Red Sox are not the same team on the road. I do not think it is a coincidence that when the series came back to Fenway, the Sox finally showed some life on offense. While Lackey and Weaver certainly pitched well and Kazmir struggled, I think the Home vs. Road splits reared their ugly heads in that series.
So yes, I’m spinning this to make the Angels look less impressive than the Yankees even though the Yankees pitched to the wet noodles (minus Sir Mauer) bats of the Twins. Although I just took a stab at the Twins offense, they put together good at-bats, worked counts and came up with quite a few timely hits. I blame their offensive futility more on the bad baserunning than the lack of hitting. Bottom line is that both teams will be pitching to better offenses this series than in the ALDS, and that’s how it is supposed to be.
I give the edge to the Yankees because I’ll take best stuff any day. There are no doubts that CC has better stuff than Lackey, and that AJ has better stuff than Weaver. Lets be honest about that. Call the third game a toss up if you’d like, but who would you take in that game? The guy tied for the All-Time lead in postseason wins? Or Kazmir, who may have better stuff at this point in both of their careers? I take Pettitte 100 times out of 100. 
I’m really looking forward to this series as it should be excellent baseball played by, in my opinion, the two best teams in baseball.

Thinking about the Angels offense

The New York Yankees, owner of the Major League’s best record, and victor (by sweep) of the ALDS over the Minnesota Twins, are about to collide head on with the cream of the AL West crop, the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim (I think I got it all). There is no doubt that this is a marquee matchup, one which could only be usurped by a Yankees vs. Red Sox showdown. 

By record, they were the top two teams in baseball; the Yankees finishing the regular season at 103 up and 59 down and the Angels at 97-65. They were also, arguably, the top two offensive teams in the baseball. We all know about the Yankees offense, which is a ferocious combination of patience and power. But let’s take a closer look at the Angels attack.
The Angels can hit; they led the Major’s in batting average at a .285 clip and tied with the Yankees for the lead in hits at 1604. They also came in right behind the Yankees in runs scored at 883 as well as RBI at 841. The Angels do it a little differently than the Yankees, stealing 148 bases, good for second behind the Rays, and finishing near the middle of the pack in home runs. Bottom line is that they can score.
There are however some myths with this Los Angeles team that need to be addressed. The biggest one being that they don’t strike out. In reality, the Angels are middle of the pack in strikeouts. They struck out more than the Yankees on the year and they certainly are not the most patient team in the world, finishing, again, in the middle of the pack in walks taken. So, do not be fooled into thinking that this is a team who takes pitches, avoids strikeouts, and does anything to get on base. The Angels are a free swinging team who rely on and the Major League’s highest batting average on balls in play (BAIBP) at .326. This number means that when the Angels hit the ball in play, it resulted in a hit just over 32 percent of the time. While the lineup is certainly made up of good hitters, this number does suggest that luck was on their side more often than any other team in baseball.
The other myth that I want to address is that the Angels are an ultra-fast team that runs at will. Two players accounted for 48 percent of their total stolen bases; Chone Figgins with 42 and Bobby Abreu with 30. Now they do have four other players who stole ten or more bases, but the bottom line is that Figgins and Abreu are the real threats. This is not a team of players that cannot be thrown out. They were successful in stolen base attempts only 70 percent of the time, good for 21st in the bigs. The Angels score runs with their speed by being aggressive going from 1st to 3rd and getting down the line, not by stealing teams to death.
The fact is that the Angels are not as old-school and “small ball” as people like to think. They can certainly do the little things, but they were an offensive force because Kendry Morales spent 2009 hitting the ball out of the park, Torri Hunter enjoyed an excellent year and Abreu set a new tone of getting a good pitch to hit for the entire offense. And although Vladimir Guerrero is aging, when healthy he’s still dangerous, just ask Jonathon Papelbon.
So expect a difference in how these teams score runs, but not as big a difference as some people would like you to believe.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.